Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Genotoxicity

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Round symbols for illustrating comments about the DYK nomination The following is an archived discussion of Genotoxicity's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you knowDYK comment symbol (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: rejected by —♦♦ AMBER(ЯʘCK) 13:57, 22 April 2013 (UTC).

Genotoxicity

[edit]

5x expanded by Ekern529 (talk), Claritycr (talk), Itelewoda (talk). Nominated by Smallman12q (talk) at 13:50, 12 April 2013 (UTC).

  • As stated above, does not meet recency requirement - 8 days old at time of nomination. I'm also not sure that the statement in the hook is specifically made and sourced with an inline cite in the article, although its generally implied by the content. (I could also add "yes, I did know that", but that's not grounds for rejection of the nom). Anaxial (talk) 09:43, 15 April 2013 (UTC)