Template:Did you know nominations/Geology of Hong Kong
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 10:16, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
Article does not pass DYK requirements at this time, and the nominator has declined to work further on reviewer concerns.
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Geology of Hong Kong[edit]
Geological map of Hong Kong. Green is volcanic rocks, red is granitic rocks.
- ... that volcanoes in Hong Kong started erupting in the Jurassic period? Source: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/249546895_Structure_control_and_tectonic_setting_of_Mesozoic_volcanism_in_Hong_Kong
- Reviewed: Jeff Chandler (footballer)
- Comment: Part of the Regional Geology class at HKU
5x expanded by HarrietHKUGeology (talk). Nominated by Graeme Bartlett (talk) at 21:32, 19 November 2018 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing:
- Suitable inline citations are missing from most of the article - Neutral:
- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
- Other problems: - Many sections are in need of copyediting for basic grammar and sentence flow
Hook eligibility:
- Cited: - No inline citation
- Interesting:
Image eligibility:
- Freely licensed:
- Used in article:
- Clear at 100px: - Extremely hard to make out at thumbnail size. I suggest using another image.
| QPQ: None required. |
Overall: 
This article needs major work before it's ready for DYK. SounderBruce 05:34, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
I'm marking this for closure. This was completed as an assignment and the creator hasn't edited since November 22. The nominator has been editing, but they have not returned to this nomination. SL93 (talk) 22:47, 9 December 2018 (UTC)- @Graeme Bartlett: Are you still willing to continue this nomination? Courtesy ping to Jo-Jo Eumerus as they have an editing interest in volcanoes. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 03:47, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
- Sorry, but right now I have little interest in Hong Kong volcanoes. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:25, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
- I will do some work today on this. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:54, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
- All sections now have a reference and it is copyedited. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:02, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
- There are still paragraphs in the Sedimentary rocks section that lack inline citations. The citation drop is also rather mediocre, as I don't think a single citation can cover each and every one of these paragraphs 100%. A spotcheck will be needed. SounderBruce 17:01, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
- Graeme Bartlett, the third paragraph under Igneous rock is still not supported by a citation. Once that's taken care of, we can ask the reviewer to resume. BlueMoonset (talk) 14:05, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
- @Graeme Bartlett: It's been a week now. Have you been able to address the concerns raised here? Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:10, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- I have added a couple of citations to these paragraphs. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:57, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- @SounderBruce: Ping. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:54, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
- First three paragraphs in the "Igneous rocks" section and first paragraph in the "Sedimentary rocks" section still have uncited sentences/paragraphs. The article is also in need of copyediting, since I can see lots of formatting/MOS issues from a quick look. SounderBruce 07:35, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
- These paragraphs all now include references. (Some tails of paragraphs have no reference but are common explanatory knowledge) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Graeme Bartlett (talk • contribs) 20:55, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- First three paragraphs in the "Igneous rocks" section and first paragraph in the "Sedimentary rocks" section still have uncited sentences/paragraphs. The article is also in need of copyediting, since I can see lots of formatting/MOS issues from a quick look. SounderBruce 07:35, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
- SounderBruce, where does this stand now? Are there still issues? BlueMoonset (talk) 22:28, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- Common explanatory knowledge either needs to be cited from resources relevant to the subject, or removed entirely in favor of letting the links explain for themselves. This has been way too drawn out, and the article really doesn't fit the freshness of DYK at this rate. SounderBruce 07:49, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
- No it doesn't. See Wikipedia:You don't need to cite that the sky is blue. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:52, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Graeme Bartlett: Are you still willing to pursue this nomination? It's been over two weeks. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 15:36, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
- I am not going to do anymore editing to add references as I now think there are enough. A reviewer can pass or fail it at their pleasure. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:18, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Graeme Bartlett: Are you still willing to pursue this nomination? It's been over two weeks. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 15:36, 16 February 2019 (UTC)