Template:Did you know nominations/Geolycosa pikei

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 20:24, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

Geolycosa pikei[edit]

5x expanded by SL93 (talk). Self-nominated at 02:26, 11 December 2018 (UTC).

  • This is sourced to the paragraph level to Canadian Journal of Zoology. (The hook depends on two sequential sentences in the article so a precise inline citation at the sentence level isn't possible.) No image and QPQ is done. Expanded, NPOV, and seemingly free of copyvio. The hook is undoubtedly interesting! Chetsford (talk) 17:00, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Hi, I came by to promote this and added conversion templates, but I don't understand what you're referring to in the second paragraph under Description. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 22:15, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
  • @Yoninah: The top of the hole. I just added that to it, but I guess I don't understand the confusion. SL93 (talk) 02:48, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
  • @SL93: the spider spins a silken lining on the top 2 inches (51 mm) or 3 inches (76 mm) of the hole doesn't make sense. I would have thought it spins something to cover the hole. This sounds like the silk is lining the upper 2-3 inches of the hole. Is that what the source says? Yoninah (talk) 15:05, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
  • Also, in comparing the hole to the "size of a knitting needle", how can it be up to 2 feet long? Have you ever seen a 2-foot-long knitting needle? Do you mean "the diameter of a knitting needle"? Sorry, I'm unable to access the source to see for myself. Yoninah (talk) 15:07, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
  • @Yoninah: That's what the source says and what wolf spiders do. That is why I said "silken lining". The lining, as I stated in the article, stops it from caving in. I don't make stuff up from sources. SL93 (talk) 17:26, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
  • I fixed the next sentence, but I still fail to see how the silken lining doesn't make sense. SL93 (talk) 17:28, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
  • Maybe you need a picture. SL93 (talk) 17:34, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
  • A picture is worth a thousand words. Thank you! Now I get it! I tweaked the wording this way: In order to stop the hole from caving in, the spider spins a silken lining around the upper 2–3 inches (51–76 mm) of the hole.
  • Restoring tick per Chetsford's review. Yoninah (talk) 20:22, 10 January 2019 (UTC)