Template:Did you know nominations/Gesomyrmex incertus
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:33, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Gesomyrmex incertus[edit]
- ... that the fossil ant Gesomyrmex incertus was described from a single queen's head? Source: "Holotype PIN 3429/1183, PIN 3429/1164 (counterprint of the same specimen), head of gyne." (Dlussky, G.M.; Rasnitsyn, A.P.; Perfilieva, K.S. (2015))
- Reviewed: Schizaphis graminum
- Comment: gyne is the myrmecological term for winged queen ant
Created by Kevmin (talk). Self-nominated at 13:15, 14 October 2016 (UTC).
Properly cited, but only one source. Can more be found? Jonathunder (talk) 16:02, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
- Two sources now. New article. No problems. OK for DYK. Jonathunder (talk) 16:50, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
- @Jonathunder: Your review does not appear to be complete. It does not mention any check for copyright violations, neutrality, or many other criteria. Pppery 21:04, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
I thought that was covered by "no problems" but to be clear, it meets the criteria. There is no copyright violation. It's long enough. It's properly cited. The article violates no policies. Jonathunder (talk) 23:06, 17 October 2016 (UTC)