Template:Did you know nominations/Glamorgan sausage

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 ^talk 18:59, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Glamorgan sausage[edit]

(

)

~~... that the earliest recording of the vegetarian Glamorgan sausage references the use of pork as an ingredient?~~

Reviewed: Welsh cuisine

5x expanded by Miyagawa (talk). Self-nominated at 11:02, 10 April 2016 (UTC).

5x expanded on 10 April (and since promoted to GA). Neutral, well referenced and appears to be free from close paraphrasing. The hook is very interesting but I can't see where the article mentions that it was the earliest recording (the source doesn't seem to state this explicitly either). 97198 (talk) 08:18, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

I've struck that hook - here's a similar alternative:

Alt1:... that an 18th-century recording of the vegetarian Glamorgan sausage references the use of pork as an ingredient?

It's the 1795 onwards bit that I'm referencing in the new hook. Miyagawa (talk) 12:22, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Great, thanks. Alt1 is good to go. 97198 (talk) 12:31, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Is it me, or is the "recording of" wording a bit odd? Surely "recipe for" would be better? Cordless Larry (talk) 05:15, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
No, it is not just you, I think it is awful too. How about "18th-century reference to"? Moriori (talk) 03:50, 15 April 2016 (UTC)