Template:Did you know nominations/Green Run (Spring Brook)
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by PanydThe muffin is not subtle 21:23, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Green Run (Spring Brook)[edit]
- ... that Green Run is not only Class A Wild Trout Waters, but meets the criteria for an Exceptional Value designation?
- ALT1:... that 16 genera in the macroinvertebrate orders Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and Trichoptera have been observed on Green Run?
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Bartholomäus Gesius
- Comment: about ALT1: those taxa are commonly used as an indicator of high water quality
Moved to mainspace by Jakec (talk). Self nominated at 02:07, 1 April 2015 (UTC).
Created on March 29 and nominated 4702 characters later on April 1, so new enough and long enough. Well written and interesting within policy and with lots of inline citations from reliable sources. Both hook and ALT1 hook are the right length, in article and referenced. I would go with the original hook though since the ALT1 requires a specific explanation and the explanation is not to be found in the article, so that hook might not be understood by that many people. (A note about the indicators in the article would not be out of place though, if only to improve general knowledge about such indicators.) And good trout fishing hooks are always catchy. (Pardon the bad pun.) Lovely article, good to go. - w.carter-Talk 19:37, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
