Template:Did you know nominations/HNoMS Storm (1898)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by BlueMoonset (talk) 05:55, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

HNoMS Storm (1898)[edit]

Created/expanded by Manxruler (talk). Self nom at 21:48, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

  • Nice article. Date and length are fine. Sources look good, though I'm necessarily AGFing as (1) they're offline and (2) they're in Norwegian, which might as well be Swahili for all the understanding I have of it. The article's well written and nicely laid out and the hook is interesting (evidently the Norwegian Navy didn't have much luck in the campaign?). I'm happy for this one to go. Prioryman (talk) 23:16, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Thanks, Prioryman. The Royal Norwegian Navy certainly had fairly limited amounts of luck in that campaign, most of the ships being captured or sunk the first couple of days. Of the 121 ships in the navy when the Germans attacked, only 14 (+ a captured German trawler) made it into exile in the UK after 62 days of fighting. Manxruler (talk) 23:29, 18 October 2012 (UTC)