Template:Did you know nominations/Hannah Newell Noyes
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 12:10, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Hannah Newell Noyes
[edit]... that women from the school that Harriet Newell Noyes founded and ran became 286 teachers and 114 doctors in Guangdong Province?
- Reviewed: QPQ = Camille Dow Baker
- Comment: 27 March is WHM?
Created by Devil-lightening (talk) and Victuallers (talk). Nominated by Victuallers (talk) at 14:48, 1 April 2015 (UTC).
New enough, long enough, meets core content policies. Hook cited to RS. GTG. What about:- ALT1: ... that Harriet Newell Noyes founded the first school for women in Guangdong Province? --Jakob (talk) aka Jakec 19:41, 8 April 2015 (UTC) edit: The file information page says the image dates to 1924 (not public domain) but then says that it dates to 1923 or earlier (public domain). --Jakob (talk) aka Jakec 19:45, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks @Jakob: - I thought it best to just move it to fair use as the rational would not be definite as she died four weeks to late! :-) Thanks. OK now I hope. Your hook is fine by me but someone else has to tick it too. Victuallers (talk) 18:40, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
New reviewer needed to check ALT hook. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:39, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
- New enough, long enough, well referenced, neutrally written, no close paraphrasing seen. However, the third paragraph under Legacy, which I tried (unsuccessfully) to edit so it would make sense, lacks a cite per DYK rules. ALT1 hook ref verified and cited inline; I changed "girls" to "women" here and in the article because this was a seminary and many of the students were already married. QPQ done. Yoninah (talk) 11:58, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
- @Yoninah: Oops... that's a silly mistake. Thanks for your review and fixes. I have added a ref to support the "citation needed" which should help. Cheers Victuallers (talk) 15:33, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
