Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Harrild & Sons

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by  MPJ-DK  00:33, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Harrild & Sons

[edit]
Jobbing press manufactured by Harrild & Sons
Jobbing press manufactured by Harrild & Sons

5x expanded by AKS.9955 (talk). Self-nominated at 19:06, 7 August 2016 (UTC).

  • Second full review required per ANI decision. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:22, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
That many references are not required in the lead. Please try moving them into the prose. As per WP:MOSLEAD. Regards, KC Velaga 06:13, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
@AKS.9955: As lead should be a summary of the body, and the points mentioned in the lead are already in the main prose, they need not be referenced again. Regards, KC Velaga 05:21, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
@Krishna Chaitanya Velaga:, that I know. But what stops me to include references / citations in the lead section? Read WP:LEADCITE. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 05:35, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
It is just a suggestion. Thanks for the information. GTG. Regards, KC Velaga 07:31, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
No more issues GTG. Regards, KC Velaga 06:09, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Krishna Chaitanya Velaga, you are supposed to do a complete second DYK review based on the DYK criteria, including checks for size, newness, neutrality, copyvio/close paraphrasing, hook sourcing, image licensing, etc. Please be sure to note everything you've checked, as should be done in all DYK reviews. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:49, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Thanks BlueMoonset, even I was not sure and that's why I reconfirmed with Krishna Chaitanya Velaga again. In anycase, we all learn something new everyday and as long as the job is done correctly, it should be fine. BlueMoonset, just out of curiosity, can you share the link to the ANI decision that you talked about above? I would like to update myself on that outcome. Cheers, Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 16:55, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Thanks BlueMoonset. I was wondering if I did something wrong which called for a second review. In any-case, we need to follow what the community has decided. Thanks for the update. Cheers, Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 17:35, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: All criteria checked and verified. GTG. Regards, KC Velaga 06:02, 18 August 2016 (UTC)