Template:Did you know nominations/Hazard substitution

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:26, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Hazard substitution[edit]

(

)

... that substitution of a hazardous chemical can backfire if it turns out to be a "regrettable substitution"? Source: [1]
- ALT1:... that substitution of a hazardous chemical can backfire if it turns out to be a "regrettable substitution" that unwittingly introduces a new hazard? Source: [2]

Reviewed: Winter time (Namibia)

Created by John P. Sadowski (NIOSH) (talk). Self-nominated at 18:48, 14 April 2017 (UTC).

Looks fine to me - new enough, long enough and reliably sourced. Both hooks are OK, but I prefer ALT1 as it's clearer for the non-chemist to understand what the underlying issue is. Prioryman (talk) 09:10, 17 April 2017 (UTC)