Template:Did you know nominations/Hevea
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 10:59, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Hevea, Hevea benthamiana, Hevea microphylla, Hevea guianensis, Hevea nitida, Hevea rigidifolia, Hevea spruceana[edit]
( Back to T:TDYK )
( Article history links: )
- ... that in the rubber tree genus Hevea, H. benthamiana, H. microphylla and H. brasiliensis are deciduous, while H. guianensis, H. nitida, H. rigidifolia and H. spruceana are evergreen?
- Reviewed: NWA World Tag Team Championships
- Comment: Hevea is expanded, and the other articles are new.
Created by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self-nominated at 18:22, 1 April 2017 (UTC).
The articles all meet the requirements. hook is interesting and cited. In the source, it doesn't say "deciduous" or "evergreen" as such, as far as I can tell, but the distinction is what's being described there, so I think that's all fine. QPQ done. This is good to go. --Coemgenus (talk) 18:48, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Don't folks who have multiple article nominations still have to do multiple QPQs also? In this case, seven? Montanabw(talk) 02:57, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
- @Montanabw: Yes they do. The hook I reviewed covered fourteen articles. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:10, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
- , You're right it does. Good to go, then. (Maybe note this next time?) Montanabw(talk) 07:35, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
- Hi, I came by to promote this, but I'm also having trouble finding a citation for "deciduous" and "evergreen". Yoninah (talk) 20:51, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
- @Yoninah:I believe the information is on each individual species page (except H. brasiliensis which is not part of the nomination). However, in the Hevea article I have now added two extra citations to the Sethura source. The information is in the source at the end of page 58 and the beginning of 59. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:14, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
- @Cwmhiraeth: thank you, now I see the hook fact very clearly in all the articles. However, in checking through them, I notice that the H. brasiliensis page is full of "citation needed" tags and also lacks cites on numerous paragraphs. Do you want to work on this, or de-link/delete it from your hook? Yoninah (talk) 19:29, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
- I have got rid of the citation needed tags in Hevea brasiliensis and added some references. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:23, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
- @Cwmhiraeth: thank you! Restoring tick per Montanabw's review. Yoninah (talk) 10:58, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
- @Yoninah:I believe the information is on each individual species page (except H. brasiliensis which is not part of the nomination). However, in the Hevea article I have now added two extra citations to the Sethura source. The information is in the source at the end of page 58 and the beginning of 59. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:14, 25 May 2017 (UTC)