Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Hinduism in Los Angeles

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 07:13, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Hinduism in Los Angeles

[edit]

Malibu Hindu Temple

Created by Dr. Blofeld (talk), Nvvchar (talk), Bonkers The Clown (talk), and Rosiestep (talk). Nominated by Dr. Blofeld (talk) at 11:05, 3 July 2013 (UTC).

  • Interesting hook, but the pipelink seems a bit misleading. I expected the link to go to a page on Hindu ceremonies, not something related to Los Angeles. Perhaps the hook could more directly address the article topic (namely, the Los Angeles aspect). The hook could include something like "was given a Hindu ceremony in Malibu." CaseyPenk (talk) 19:29, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Tweaked, OK?♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 08:39, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

  • The tweak of the hook definitely works better, per the above recommendation. The article is long enough and new enough, well-written and well-sourced, and the image is also good to go! Great work! --Caponer (talk) 20:38, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
  • But the temple is not in the city of Los Angeles. An unqualified mention of "Los Angeles" almost always refers to the city, rather than the county, so this looks like misinformation. You probably don't want to pipe Hinduism in Los Angeles to the actual city, "Calabasas", but how about to either "Los Angeles County" or "the Los Angeles area"? MANdARAX  XAЯAbИAM 00:35, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
  • In that case the article title itself could be be changed to Los Angeles County if it is acceptable to you.--Nvvchar. 05:43, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Well, in looking at the article, I noticed that the Los Angeles Hindu Society is based in Pasadena. If the L.A. Hindu Society is not based in the city of L.A., then maybe the broader sense of L.A. to mean the greater L.A. area is more common than I thought. It's up to you, but I think it's probably not necessary to move the article. As for the hook, I'd still personally prefer it to be tweaked, but it's up to you. I've visited the Temple, and it seems odd to say it's in L.A. when I know that it's not in the city of L.A., but it is in the county/area, so the hook is technically correct. MANdARAX  XAЯAbИAM 10:34, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
  • That's fine with me. For the benefit of set preparers, I've reiterated Caponer's tick. MANdARAX  XAЯAbИAM 20:13, 5 July 2013 (UTC)