The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:07, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
... that Hintersche was a card game played by farmers, foresters and journeymen in the Principality of Fürstenberg that is still played in the Black Forest today? Source: "Hintersche... is a card game that goes back to an old tradition in the Black Forest. It is … only known in a few communities around Bad Rippoldsau-Schapbach. … this game was mostly played among the farmers and forest workers / day labourers in the former principality of Fürstenberg" [1] and [2]
Overall: There are several paragraphs that need to be inline cited first. Some of the content for the hook was not cited so I added an inline citation to the first sentence in the first paragraph; it was actually sourced by the citation numbered 1. I added citation 1 to the hook too. All of the other criteria is met except for a copy violation check. Earwig is down, and I think it may have been moved..but I can't locate it. I will try again later. The hook is just the right length and is worded appropriately. dawnleelynn(talk) 18:12, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
@Dawnleelynn: thanks, that's helpful. The only uncited paragraphs are those in the Rules section which are all covered by the opening sentence of that section. Of course, we can repeat the citation every time, but normally that's not seen as necessary. Bermicourt (talk) 18:27, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
I'm just following the DYK Reviewing Guideline here. See Wikipedia:Did you know/Reviewing guide. "The article in general should use inline cited sources. A rule of thumb for DYK is a minimum of one citation per paragraph, possibly excluding the introduction, plot summaries, and paragraphs which summarize information that's cited elsewhere." Thanks! dawnleelynn(talk) 18:59, 16 February 2019 (UTC) p.s. One at the end of paragraph ought to do it., thanks. dawnleelynn(talk) 19:02, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
No probs, that's done. Bermicourt (talk) 19:20, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
Okay, I got Earwig to work, page says it will be troublesome for a couple days. But the comparison is mostly to German language pages anyway. Will have to trust user. All paragraphs are now inline cited as required. Everything looks good. Hook is approved. Thank you Bermicourt for fixing issue promptly. Nomination approved. dawnleelynn(talk) 19:34, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
There are several paragraphs that need to be inline cited first. Some of the content for the hook was not cited so I added an inline citation to the first sentence in the first paragraph; it was actually sourced by the citation numbered 1. I added citation 1 to the hook too. All of the other criteria is met except for a copy violation check. Earwig is down, and I think it may have been moved..but I can't locate it. I will try again later. The hook is just the right length and is worded appropriately. dawnleelynn(talk) 18:12, 16 February 2019 (UTC)