Template:Did you know nominations/Hoshimachi Suisei

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Amkgp (talk) 17:32, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Hoshimachi Suisei

  • ... that the initial character design of Hoshimachi Suisei, the Japanese Virtual YouTuber, was created and rigged by herself? Source: [1] 個人勢時代は、キャラクターデザインや動画編集など自身が製作していた過去があります。

Created by Sacchisachi (talk). Self-nominated at 10:22, 11 August 2020 (UTC).

  • Does this subject meet WP:GNG? It seems to be a self-promotional piece. Yoninah (talk) 17:02, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
    Indeed, the article contains not all but many primary sources. I will improve it as much as I can. Is there anything else that I can do to make it a non self-promotional looking piece?--Sacchisachi (talk) 08:45, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
  • @Sacchisachi: She has to be notable. Even though she's very active, she has to meet the criteria at WP:BIO. Yoninah (talk) 11:04, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Now I think she meets the criteria at WP:BIO. As musician, she had a single on Japanese national music chart. She has appeared in many stage events and live performances in Japan and China. She reached a few milestones which made prolific contribution to the virtual YouTuber culture.--Sacchisachi (talk) 07:16, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
  • @Sacchisachi: please let me know when you're finished adding more primary references. And please expand the lead per WP:LEAD, adding more about her notability. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 12:09, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
  • I finished adding references and the lead section.Sorry for being lateSacchisachi (talk) 05:30, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for your work on this article. Here is a full review: New enough, long enough, neutrally written, well referenced. As most refs are foreign-language, unable to check for close paraphrasing. The ALT0 hook is somewhat interesting but not worded well; it doesn't mention Twitter and could use some editing. I have provided an edited version of ALT1 which I think reads well. Foreign-language hook refs verified and cited inline. QPQ done. ALT1a good to go. Yoninah (talk) 21:00, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Thank you for your cooperation! I also approve ALT1a.Sacchisachi (talk) 03:18, 6 September 2020 (UTC)