Template:Did you know nominations/House and Land
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 01:36, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
House and Land
House and Land perform in Brooklyn, New York in July 2017
- ... that experimental folk band House and Land (pictured) have reinterpreted traditional ballads to remove misogyny by focusing on female protagonists? Source: "they’ve often tweaked songs that bore strains of misogyny or violence, which they feel is integral to the work of interpreting traditional songs." [1]
- ALT1:... that female duo House and Land (pictured) covered the traditional murder ballad "Two Sisters" as a harmony on the guitar and banjo in 2019? Source: "Despite its bleak narrative of extreme sibling estrangement, murder ballad "Two Sisters" sets the scene serenely with Morgan's banjo and lead vocals complemented charmingly by Henson's harmonies and electric guitar lines." [2]
- Reviewed: Atsushi Fujiwara and
Good (political party)
- Reviewed: Atsushi Fujiwara and
Created by Patrickneil (talk). Self-nominated at 21:45, 7 August 2019 (UTC).
- Review by Maile
- QPQ
- Two QPQs listed, but only one is required. I have struck the "Good (political party)" QPQ, so it can be used on another nomination of the editor's choice.
- Eligibility
- Article created August 7, and has 1919 characters (304 words) "readable prose size"
- Sourcing
- All verifiable sourcing used.
- Hook
- Original hook is 135 characters and is sourced
- ALT1 is 127characters and is sourced
- Images
- Hook image is in the article, uploaded on Commons and licensed
- Copyvio check
- Spot check with Duplication Detector check shows no issues of concern
- Earwig's tool shows no issues of concern
This nomination is good to go. — Maile (talk) 19:35, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I came by to promote this, but I don't see the ALT1 hook (my preference) mentioned in the article at all, and I don't see anything in the two inline cites given for the ALT0 hook. The inline cites, immediately following the sentence in which the hook fact appears, should be in the article, not just here on the nomination template. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 01:01, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
Facepalm In the words of Homer Simpson: "Doh!" It just took a little adding to a sentence, so I did and put a source at the end. — Maile (talk) 01:22, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
