Template:Did you know nominations/How the Red Sun Rose

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Dylan620 talk 20:53, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

DYK toolbox

How the Red Sun Rose

(
)
  • ... that How the Red Sun Rose rewrote scholarly understanding of the Yan'an Rectification Movement and showed that authors who accepted the Party line narrative were deceived? Source: "In sharp contrast to the Party line that describes the movement as a salubrious thought-reform process, to which much of the earlier Western scholarship subscribed, Gao reminds readers that the relatively liberal Yan’an Spring was short-lived—less than two months long [...] How the Red Sun Rose renders obsolete much of the earlier scholarship on Yan’an and Mao. [...] Contemporary observers, such as Edgar Snow, and scholars who accepted Mao’s two-line struggle narrative were sold a bill of goods." https://read.dukeupress.edu/journal-of-asian-studies/article/78/4/898/320270
    • Reviewed:

Created by Thomas Meng (talk). Self-nominated at 21:25, 14 November 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/How the Red Sun Rose; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

General: Article is new enough and long enough

Policy compliance:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: None required.

Overall: Could I suggest a not-short-but-maybe-punchy alt like:

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Did_you_know_nominations/How_the_Red_Sun_Rose&oldid=1196904014"