Template:Did you know nominations/Hsien of the Dead

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 13:54, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Hsien of the Dead[edit]

Created by Bonkers The Clown (talk). Self nominated at 08:57, 27 September 2013 (UTC).

  • New, long enough, within policy, no copyvio found via tool, QPQ done. Hook refs are not sound: Shaw is not a source of reliable content (and the "first" part is a slogan on a stock image), and the other link is from a WordPress blog and either needs to be removed and accepted on good faith if you have a print copy, or altogether new sources need to be found. Alternatively, the hook and article can say that the movie is "marked as" the first (which would admittedly be less interesting). Please ping me if I don't respond. czar  19:22, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
The WordPress copy is just a digital scan of a reliable newspaper piece. ☯ Bonkers The Clown \(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble ☯ 03:37, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
It's my understanding that it is unreliable by virtue of not being directly from the source. Like I couldn't use a page from a book scanned and put on someone's website both because that is copyright infringement and because I have no guarantee the text wasn't changed. If you had the original in print but not a digital copy and then dropped the link, I would accept the source on good faith (but only if you had the original in print and were vouching for it). czar  03:47, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
Found the original URL. ☯ Bonkers The Clown \(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble ☯ 04:06, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
I found that site before but didn't replace the link since the content is no longer live. As I said before, I'd need your confirmation that you read the original source and then I can assume good faith. If you haven't used the real source, we'd be mistrusting our faith. czar  04:26, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
Yes, I have read it before. I have been subscribing to the print issues of The Business Times, as well as others, for a few years and I always read it daily. I'd suppose giving the online source would be fine as they are the same thing. ☯ Bonkers The Clown \(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble ☯ 12:16, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
czar  12:55, 18 October 2013 (UTC)