Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Humanistic coefficient

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Round symbols for illustrating comments about the DYK nomination The following is an archived discussion of Humanistic coefficient's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you knowDYK comment symbol (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: promoted by Miyagawa (talk) 09:58, 23 February 2013 (UTC).

Humanistic coefficient

[edit]

Created by Piotrus (talk). Self nominated at 19:36, 15 February 2013 (UTC).

  • 5x expanded, long enough, neutral, cited. AGF on offline sources, no close paraphrasing issues with the online ones. Hook is short enough, and in my view sufficiently puzzling to be interesting. I would be inclined to strike out the word "sociological" from the hook, but cannot make such a suggestion and also say: good to go. Aymatth2 (talk) 01:58, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Shouldn't that be "the humanistic coeffecient" both in the hook and throughout the article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Carabinieri (talkcontribs)
  • I am not convinced "the" is always grammatically needed, but agree it would be an improvement. If I make a change, I cannot re-approve. Maybe someone else, maybe Piotrus, will add "the" before "humanistic coefficient" everywhere it appears in hook or in article as Carabinieri suggests. Thanks, Aymatth2 (talk) 03:13, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
ALT1: ... that the humanistic coefficient is a major element in the sociological theory of Florian Znaniecki?
  • . Close enough - good to go. Aymatth2 (talk) 03:53, 23 February 2013 (UTC)