Template:Did you know nominations/Hypericum × inodorum

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bruxton talk 18:24, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Hypericum × inodorum

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

Hypericum × inodorum 'Golden Beacon'

• ... that despite its name meaning "unscented", Hypericum × inodorum (pictured) can smell strongly of goat? Source: "there are some forms of H. x inodorum where the smell characteristic of hircinum [that being of a goat] is quite apparent" Robson, Norman (1985). "Studies in the genus Hypericum L. (Guttiferae). 3. Sections 1. Campylosporus to 6a. Umbraculoides". Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) Botany. 12: 307
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Telephone-pole beetle

Created by Fritzmann2002 (talk). Self-nominated at 14:08, 6 March 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Hypericum × inodorum; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
Freely licensed: Used in article: Clear at 100px:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Was also the GA reviewer. The article obviously passes all the DYK criteria, but are GA reviewers allowed to check DYK nominations for the articles they've reviewed? AryKun (talk) 15:59, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

• AryKun, WP:DYKRR says not. New reviewer required. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 14:22, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

We are in WP:QPQ backlog mode. Double reviews are required.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 06:53, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

It is not correct that backlog mode applies to this nomination, since it was made on 6 March, and backlog mode was initiated at 00:00 UTC 8 March 2024. A new reviewer is, however, needed because the GA reviewer may not review the DYK nomination as well. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:31, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

New GA, well written, no copyvio—one sourcing question. @Fritzmann2002: Might be overlooking, but where is it stated that Tournefort's mention is the first mention? I'm not seeing it in Robson. QPQ present, hook and photo check out. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 03:01, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

@Hameltion: to my understanding, Tournefort states himself that it is a new combination/description in saying "hyperici speciebus addenda sequentes", basically "new Hypericum species I am adding" in Institutiones rei herbariae. Thank you for the review! Fritzmann (message me) 03:15, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

As another point, Miller credits Tounefort as the origin in The Gardeners Dictionary by annotating "Tourn." after his specific description. Fritzmann (message me) 03:17, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

That totally works, thanks for clarifying. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 03:23, 19 March 2024 (UTC)