Template:Did you know nominations/IWRG Legado Final

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by  MPJ-DK  16:32, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

IWRG Legado Final[edit]

Created by MPJ-DK (talk). Self-nominated at 15:45, 4 July 2016 (UTC).

  • No issues found with article, ready for human review.
    • This article is new and was created on 01:46, 02 July 2016 (UTC)
    • This article meets the DYK criteria at 6056 characters
    • All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
    • This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
    • A copyright violation is unlikely (4.8% confidence; confirm)
      • Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
  • Some overall issues detected

Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This bot is experimental; please report any issues. This is not a substitute for a human review. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 23:45, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

  • Note to reviewer I had originally submitted this as part of a 70-DYK submission. After a comunity discussion it was agreed it would be better to withdraw that one and put up smaller hooks. The QPQ was originally listed on the 70-DYK page but since it never went to the main page it was never "spent" if you will.  MPJ-DK  23:53, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Full review needed by human reviewer. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:14, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

This page is long enough (6047 characters/1055 words) and new enough. It is written neutrally with no copyvios detected. References in foreign language (including inline citation for hook) taken in good faith. Hook is short enough. QPQ is done. Image is CC By-SA 2.0. Good to go. SojoQ (talk) 10:04, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

I have returned this from prep 6 as I was unable to verify; the first source does not point to an article but to a front page, and I couldn't see any place in the second that confirmed the hook. Gatoclass (talk) 14:12, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
  • @Gatoclass: - Totally understandable, glad someone caught this. The first link is fixed, they changed their URL scheme at some point and I did not reflet this in the source but it works now. Second source lists "El Pantera e Hijo" as participants - since his ring name is "Hijo del Pantera" I hope the shortened version is acceptable? and third source checks out as you already mentioned. Hope this addresses all concerns? If not let me know and I'll get on it.  MPJ-DK  14:26, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
    • Sorry about that. Glad you caught it. SojoQ (talk) 16:39, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
  • @Gatoclass: - Could I get a check on this at some point to make sure I addressed the issues?? Thanks.  MPJ-DK  03:06, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Gatoclass - hook pulled August 30, issues addressed shortly after the pull. It is now September 6, could I possibly get a reassement and "re-ticked" if possible? Allowing other prep builders to pick this one up.  MPJ-DK  01:19, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
I haven't forgotten about this nomination MPJ-DK, but I'm afraid I am struggling with DYK burnout right now and can't bring myself to do any more reviewing, least of all, of nominations that I anticipate may cause me headaches. If somebody else doesn't pick this up in the meantime, I will probably get back to this one some time in the next week. Gatoclass (talk) 13:51, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
  • I'm sorry, but I'm just finding this too hard to verify, apparently I'm expected to wade through half a dozen different sources, all written in a foreign language that google translate does a poor job of translating, compiling a list of all participants for each year so I can figure out whether the hook is correct or not. That is just way too much to expect anybody to do. Please try to come up with a hook that's a bit easier to verify. Gatoclass (talk) 15:35, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
  • That is what a DYK reviewer has to do. Although in this case it is just 3 sources 10, 11 and 12 are results for each year listing the main event competitors.
  • "too hard".  MPJ-DK  16:33, 12 September 2016 (UTC)