Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/In Theory (Star Trek: The Next Generation)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Round symbols for illustrating comments about the DYK nomination The following is an archived discussion of In Theory (Star Trek: The Next Generation)'s DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you knowDYK comment symbol (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: promoted by Carabinieri (talk) 18:36, 24 February 2013 (UTC).

In Theory (Star Trek: The Next Generation)[edit]

  • Reviewed: Torre de los Adalides
  • Comment: Expanded from 1137 characters to 6857, however something is throwing the DYKChecker off.

5x expanded by Miyagawa (talk). Self nominated at 14:31, 22 February 2013 (UTC).

  • Fivefold expansion looks ok to me; I don't know why DYKCheck is not showing it correctly. Hook is sourced to an appropriate offline source (not checked). There is a reasonably appropriate balance of plot summary to other material. My one critique is that the several of the reviews are fansites -- is this normal for this type of article? Espresso Addict (talk) 17:01, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
  • I tend not to use all fan sites - the author of Jammer's Reviews is a reliable source in his own right on Star Trek topics as he was taken so seriously by the production teams that they flew him out to Los Angeles to pitch stories for Star Trek: Voyager. TrekNation on the other hand has been previously used in the FA These Are the Voyages..., including a couple by Michelle Green who wrote the review in this article. Miyagawa (talk) 17:55, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Who am I to dispute reliability with the featured crowd... Espresso Addict (talk) 08:30, 24 February 2013 (UTC)