Template:Did you know nominations/Intuitive eating
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by BlueMoonset (talk) 01:12, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
Article has been deleted at AfD; closing nomination since no article exists anymore to be nominated.
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Intuitive eating[edit]
- ... that eating intuitively is positively associated with self esteem, positive affect, and life satisfaction? Source: "Tylka, T. L., & Kroon Van Diest, A. M. (2013)" [1]
- ALT1:... that research shows women who eat intuitively are more satisfied with their bodies? Source: "Bacon, L., Stern, J. S., Van Loan, M. D., & Keim, N. L. (2005)" [2]
5x expanded by Cgorman4 (talk). Self-nominated at 14:18, 26 April 2018 (UTC).
I'm afraid I and another editor both have concerns about the article as it stands; as the subject is in the vicinity of a medical topic, standards are very high for sourcing, verifiability, neutrality, etc. and it seems to me there's quite a bit still to be worked out, ideally with input from a number of editors experienced with this kind of topic, before it would be ready for Main page. I truly appreciate the efforts to improve this entry and hope you won't feel discouraged Cgorman4; for most other topics, your expansion would be quite appropriate for DYK. It's just that medical topics really are handled somewhat differently from most of the rest of the encyclopedia so it can be a bit of a longer haul (see WP:MEDHOW for a general intro and links to more detailed instructions) than other topics require. Doesn't mean the work isn't appreciated, just that even more work (whew!) is still ahead; so I thank you for your past and future contributions! Happy editing, Innisfree987 (talk) 00:44, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
I agree that the article needs more work and so would classify this as a maybe. We need to see how the AfD turns out and then take it from there. Andrew D. (talk) 12:27, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
- The AfD's now closed as delete so I think we can close the DYK nom out as well, but a couple of us are in touch with the entry's creator about writing a new version in more suitable form and submitting through AfC, so perhaps they will submit that to DYK--I assume there's no prejudice against doing so. Innisfree987 (talk) 07:54, 25 May 2018 (UTC)