Template:Did you know nominations/Israel and state-sponsored terrorism
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by Yoninah (talk) 21:09, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Israel and state-sponsored terrorism[edit]
- ... that during the Israel-Gaza conflict Israel has been accused of state-sponsored terrorism for its actions in Gaza by some countries?
- ALT1:... that according to the Israel and state-sponsored terrorism, In a report of UN Disengagement Observer Force is said that Israel cooperates with Syrian rebels including ISIS and al-Qaeda?
- ALT2:... that according to the Israel and state-sponsored terrorism, Mossad is accused of killing Masoud Alimohammadi , Majid Shahriari, Darioush Rezaeinejad and Mostafa Ahmadi-Roshan as Iranian nuclear scientists?
Created by Homiho (talk). Self-nominated at 11:13, 13 March 2016 (UTC).
- Comment: This is not a review, but I would like to point out that Supplemental Rule D6 states that dispute tags should be resolved before an article is approved (see WP:DYKSG). -- Notecardforfree (talk) 08:27, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
(edit conflict) @Homiho: Agree with Note here, Rule D6 does state that dispute tags should be removed and looking at the article I can see why they are there. It seriously requires some copyediting before we could pass it and I also share the concern about neutrality in this. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 09:11, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
- Homiho, I see that it's been about a week since you have edited this article. Do you have plans to address the concerns that were raised on the article's talk page? If there is no progress made on this article over the next few days, we may want to consider closing this nomination. Best, -- Notecardforfree (talk) 09:07, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Article retains neutrality and copyediting tags, and nominator has not edited on Wikipedia in over two weeks. Under the circumstances, it's time to close the nomination as unsuccessful. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:08, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
