Template:Did you know nominations/Jagoda Truhelka

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by HaEr48 (talk) 07:35, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

Jagoda Truhelka[edit]

Truhelka on a 1916 postcard
Truhelka on a 1916 postcard
  • ... that despite writing extensively about women's rights and being the first Croatian author to feature a feminist character, Jagoda Truhelka (pictured) remains best known for her children's literature?
    Source: "Truhelka je najpoznatija po prozi za djecu..."[1]
    • ALT1:... that the writer Jagoda Truhelka (pictured) led a feminist network in the 1890s Zagreb and featured the first feminist character and the first antiheroine in Croatia?
      Source: "...the central figure of the network, Jagoda Truhelka..."[2], "Pripada joj i mjesto prve pripovjedačice u čijem se romanu pojavljuje ženski lik s feminističkim preokupacijama koji je intelektualno superioran ostalima..."[3]

Created by Surtsicna (talk). Self-nominated at 21:20, 20 May 2018 (UTC).

  • Will start the review within 24 hours or so. GregorB (talk) 20:51, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
  • I'm sorry about the delay, I got a bit sidetracked IRL.
  • The article is new enough (created on May 19), long enough. QPQ done. No cleanup tags or obvious problems, the prose is fine. Sources are OK, inline references used throughout the article, no unreferenced paragraphs. The image looks OK, sourced to Commons, is PD, appears in the article. No copyvio or close paraphrasing detected.
  • The main hook is rather long at 199 characters (without ellipsis, including the question mark and "(pictured)") and thus very near the DYK hook limit, whereas ALT1 is somewhat shorter (165). I'd shorten it further and reword it a bit as follows:
  • AGF on all three hooks, as they are properly formed and all the statements in question appear in the article and are inline cited. Good to go. GregorB (talk) 22:15, 2 June 2018 (UTC)