Template:Did you know nominations/James Caudy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by — Maile (talk) 13:02, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

James Caudy[edit]

Caudy's Castle

Created by Caponer (talk). Self nominated at 04:25, 22 November 2013 (UTC).

  • Before undertaking a review, I'd like to mention that I find it hard to believe that 53 citations are all cited to one page in Munske & Kerns (footnote 1). Yoninah (talk) 23:52, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
  • I may have over cited within the article's prose, but every citation denotes information gleaned from that page in Munske & Kerns. Other than that, I don't know what else to tell you. -- Caponer (talk) 04:08, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
  • Yoninah, would an image taken of the page in question from Munske & Kerns (2004) assist you in your review? I would like to assuage your doubts about the citations from this page within the article. -- Caponer (talk) 01:17, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
  • Yes, it would. Yoninah (talk) 20:35, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
  • Thanks Yoninah! Please let me know if you need any additional resources to complete your review. Thanks again for taking the time! Munske & Kerns 2004 link -- Caponer (talk) 01:56, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
  • Article is new enough, long enough, well referenced, no close paraphrasing seen in the sources I can access. QPQ done (only 1 was needed for this nomination). Hook is very hooky and verified both in the link you sent me and in the historical marker pictured in the article. Excellent research job, and very good article! Good to go. Yoninah (talk) 17:30, 16 December 2013 (UTC)