Template:Did you know nominations/Janet Stumbo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Jolly Ω Janner 08:35, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Janet Stumbo[edit]

Created by Acdixon (talk). Self-nominated at 15:16, 10 March 2016 (UTC).

  • Moved to mainspace on March 9, nominated on March 10/new enough. 15910 char/long enough. Neutral, cited, no apparent copyvios. No image with nomination. QPQ done. Main hook 200 char/at maximum. Alt 1 172 char/under max. Alt 2 193 char/under maximum. None of the sourcing is available in links and must be AGF. Main hook has a citation following each sentence in name controversy section. Alt1 has a citation immediately following. Alt 2 does not seem to be supported by the statement in the article, which simply states that a portion of the code of conduct was removed, which might indicate how someone would rule. That doesn't seem to be a position on an issue, but rather a legal determination. It may be that the change did refer to a position, but I don't see that in the article and since there is no access to the source, striking alt2. SusunW (talk) 15:23, 26 March 2016 (UTC)