The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Maile66 (talk) 01:07, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
Overall: Interesting article and interesting hook. Article meets all the criteria, as does the hook, and I see no reason not to approve. JJonahJackalope (talk) 13:34, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
@JJonahJackalope: I've reworded the hook a bit and added an explanatory note to the article. The hook needs a re-review. Therapyisgood (talk) 15:33, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Looks good, explanatory note works and I see no reason not to approve this new hook. -JJonahJackalope (talk) 17:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC)