Template:Did you know nominations/Kepler-1647b
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 16:32, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Kepler-1647b[edit]
[[File:|120x133px|Artist's impression of Kepler-1647b ]]
Artist's impression of Kepler-1647b
... that Kepler-1647b is the largest, and has the longest year, of any planet orbiting two suns?
Created by Hexafluoride (talk). Self-nominated at 15:32, 14 June 2016 (UTC).
- I really don't like the notion of using a hook that could be disproved simply by finding a counterexample. It's the largest, and has the longest year, of any circumbinary planet that we've discovered so far; however, the universe is very big and there are many things to look at. DS (talk) 14:18, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
- @DragonflySixtyseven: This can be easily resolved by adding yet, or known.
- ALT1: ... that Kepler-1647b is the largest, and has the longest year, of any known planet orbiting two suns?
- This is happening now, and it's a big discovery. I don't think it that should be excluded just because there's a possibility it will no longer be true in the near future. ¬Hexafluoride (talk) 22:38, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
New enough (Hexafluoride on 14 June 2016), long enough (2,211 characters "readable prose size"), not fully referenced. Hook fine, supported by online reference. Image on Commons, with appropriate licence. Editor has only one prior DYK, so no QPQ required. Good to go. Hawkeye7 (talk) 03:25, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
- I really don't like the notion of using a hook that could be disproved simply by finding a counterexample. It's the largest, and has the longest year, of any circumbinary planet that we've discovered so far; however, the universe is very big and there are many things to look at. DS (talk) 14:18, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
