Template:Did you know nominations/King George VI Memorial Chapel
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by RoySmith (talk) 17:43, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
King George VI Memorial Chapel
- ... that Queen Elizabeth II wanted the King George VI Memorial Chapel to hold the remains of three British monarchs and their consorts? Source: https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/IF0501475187/TTDA?u=wes_ttda&sid=bookmark-TTDA&xid=a9eafb8a Douglas Keay, Princess Margaret's ashes to rest by her father, The Times, page 3, 15 February 2002 "The moment of the Princess's interment is likely to be particularly poignant for the Queen, who some 30 years ago instructed architects to design a new chantry to one side of St George's Chapel with places specifically for three monarchs and their consorts".]
Created by No Swan So Fine (talk). Self-nominated at 12:13, 18 September 2022 (UTC).
- Article is neutral, meets the required length, and is sufficiently referenced—created on 14 September, within seven days of this nomination. Hook is incredibly interest, succinct, and reliably sourced; relevant to recent events too, which is always good. QPQ looks good (thanks for that!). This is good to go! – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 00:22, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
- @No Swan So Fine and Rhain: unfortunately, bare URLs are a violation of DYK's supplementary guidelines – can those be cleaned up first? theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 02:02, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Theleekycauldron: Thanks for the ping! It appears that ref was added after the DYK review; I've cleaned it up. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 05:14, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
- Awesome, thanks! theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 05:18, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Theleekycauldron: Thanks for the ping! It appears that ref was added after the DYK review; I've cleaned it up. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 05:14, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
- @No Swan So Fine and Rhain: unfortunately, bare URLs are a violation of DYK's supplementary guidelines – can those be cleaned up first? theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 02:02, 3 October 2022 (UTC)