Template:Did you know nominations/Last Judgment (van der Weyden)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Gatoclass (talk) 13:50, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Last Judgment (van der Weyden)[edit]

Detail of Jesus Christ and the Archangel Michael in judgement.

Expanded by Ceoil (talk). Self nominated at 20:02, 16 November 2013 (UTC).

Reviewed: Magdalena Bermejo.
  • The sentence to which the hook refers does not have an inline citation. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:41, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
  • Ok will dig out. Ceoil (talk) 15:15, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

good 2 go.--BabbaQ (talk) 16:24, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

No it isn't. The hook fact still doesn't have a citation. DoctorKubla (talk) 10:05, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
Apologies for the delay. I've cited this now. Ceoil (talk) 00:11, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
Okay. Full review needed (I don't feel qualified to review this one myself). DoctorKubla (talk)
Impressive article on good sources, offline sources (including for the hook) accepted AGF. I like "warn" as in the article better than "unsettle" in the hook, but can't tell what the source says. I don't think the mentioning of the time in the hook helps creating interest and suggest to drop it. I could also imagine a completely different hook saying that it is in a hospital. - Article: I would prefer to see the image of Isenheim further down, where it's mentioned. If it's not moved, I suggest a caption which explains the context. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:10, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
Thanks. Have changed the hook as suggested. Agree re Isenheim, that sect needs expanding anyway. Ceoil (talk) 00:54, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
  • Thank you! The image is free, but difficult size ;) - I suggest to drop "and" in "commissioned and intended":
ALT1: ... that Rogier van der Weyden's polyptych painting The Last Judgment (detail pictured) was commissioned for the Hospices de Beaune, intended to both comfort and warn the dying?
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:29, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
Phew! Ceoil (talk) 11:03, 7 December 2013 (UTC)