Template:Did you know nominations/Life Story Work

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Round symbols for illustrating comments about the DYK nomination The following is an archived discussion of Life Story Work's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you knowDYK comment symbol (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: promoted by Carabinieri (talk) 18:26, 24 February 2013 (UTC).

Life Story Work[edit]

Created by Staceydolxx (talk). Nominated by Worm That Turned (talk) at 14:28, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

  • The hook is interesting, the statement is sourced, the article is long enough. There are currently some structural changes to the article that need to be made. I'll address them on the article talk page and it should be good to go after that. Ryan Vesey 18:32, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
    • Suggested structural changes have been made, though I don't believe they should hold up the process. If anyone else wants to give it a once over, I think it's good to go. WormTT(talk) 19:57, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Review needed to see whether article is now ready for approval. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:14, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Article - moved from user space on nomination date of 8 February, so new enough; excluding the bulleted list, there are 5937 characters of readable prose, so long enough; neutral; at least one inline citation to every paragraph; no copy vios detected using earwig; also ran a couple of online refs through duplication detector; I changed to start class and did a very minor copy edit.
  • Hook - within length criteria at concise 63 characters; correctly formatted; correctly cited/supported by ref #20; and will draw attention.
  • No QPQ necessary as not self nom; no images in article.
Seems to meet DYK requirements. SagaciousPhil - Chat 17:49, 24 February 2013 (UTC)