Template:Did you know nominations/Like I'm Gonna Lose You
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by BlueMoonset (talk) 23:19, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
Article was delisted and is no longer a GA, so the nomination is no longer eligible for DYK
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Like I'm Gonna Lose You[edit]
- ... that Meghan Trainor's "Like I'm Gonna Lose You" spent four weeks atop the Australian Singles Chart?
- ALT1 ...that Meghan Trainor's "Like I'm Gonna Lose You" was likened to the works of Marvin Gaye and Tammi Terrell?
Improved to Good-article status by MaranoBoy (talk). Nominated by MaranoBoy (talk) at 10:06, 13 October 2016 (UTC).
:*
Both hooks are referenced but I think the ALT1 is a better choice. The article recently passed GA, and this will be the nominator's fifth DYK, so no QPQ is needed. Good to go. Javier Espinoza (talk) 23:57, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
@Jaespinoza: Your review does not mention any check for copyvios or many other DYK criteria. Such criteria cannot be assumed on good articles as, quoting BlueMoonset on XHLUV-FM, A number of previous GAs have had significant issues discovered during DYK reviews, from sources to copyvios. GA reviews are usually the product of a single reviewer, and have no guarantee of quality
. Pppery 00:06, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
- @Pppery: That user didn't come back. What should I do now?--MaranoFan (talk) 05:15, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
- I am here, but I've been busy and its been a while since I reviewed a DYK, I am trying to be as inclusive as possible. The article is long enough, i found a 74% confidence using the Earwig's Copyvio Detector link, is neutral, cites sources with inline citations, the hook is interesting and has been correctly adapted from the source (Rolling Stone). Javier Espinoza (talk) 19:26, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
- The high percentage of copyvio comes from a long attributed quote and a website that seems to have made an unattributed copy of Wikipedia. Pppery 19:30, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
- I am kind of lost here, what should I do next?. Javier Espinoza (talk) 20:16, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
- @Jaespinoza: I'll take over this review then.
This article is undergoing a good article reassessment, and thus this is placed on hold until that completed. Pppery 20:53, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
- The high percentage of copyvio comes from a long attributed quote and a website that seems to have made an unattributed copy of Wikipedia. Pppery 19:30, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
- I am here, but I've been busy and its been a while since I reviewed a DYK, I am trying to be as inclusive as possible. The article is long enough, i found a 74% confidence using the Earwig's Copyvio Detector link, is neutral, cites sources with inline citations, the hook is interesting and has been correctly adapted from the source (Rolling Stone). Javier Espinoza (talk) 19:26, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
Article was delisted following a Good Article Reassessment, so it does not qualify for DYK as it is not a Good Article. Should the article successfully become a Good Article in future, it can be nominated again at DYK. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:19, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
