Template:Did you know nominations/List of G:link stations
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 04:34, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
List of G:link stations[edit]
- ... that in preparation for the 2018 Commonwealth Games, three stations will be added to the initial sixteen stations in the G:link, a light rail system serving the Gold Coast in Queensland, Australia?
- ALT1:... that in preparation for the 2018 Commonwealth Games, three stations will be added to the initial sixteen stations in the G:link?
- Comment: I am a relatively new editor. This is my first DYK nomination. Please excuse my inexperience. I would appreciate any assistance.
5x expanded by New9374 (talk). Self-nominated at 02:13, 11 June 2016 (UTC).
Congratulations on your first DYK nom, you've done a great job on this article and I hope it's the first of many DYKs for you. The article is a big improvement on how it was a week ago, but you haven't quite met the 5x expansion in prose requirement. You're very close though – you've taken it from 473 characters to 2287, so you only need to add another sentence to get there.
- Beyond that, the article is well written, and contains no WP:COPYVIO as far as I can see. Inline citations are included, and the hook is referenced. The hook is a little bit wordy, coming in a smidge under the maximum character count of 200, but I prefer it to ALT1 because it gives a bit more context. QPQ is not necessary as editor has no previous DYKs. — Gasheadsteve Talk to me 11:33, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for your praise and encouragement Gasheadsteve. I have added another sentence so it should meet the 5x expansion requirement now. I can't think of a shorter way to word the hook. Thanks. New9374 (talk) 13:49, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Article is now 5x expanded, so it's good to go. — Gasheadsteve Talk to me 08:49, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
- Beyond that, the article is well written, and contains no WP:COPYVIO as far as I can see. Inline citations are included, and the hook is referenced. The hook is a little bit wordy, coming in a smidge under the maximum character count of 200, but I prefer it to ALT1 because it gives a bit more context. QPQ is not necessary as editor has no previous DYKs. — Gasheadsteve Talk to me 11:33, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
