Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/List of Green Bay Packers Associated Press All-Pro selections

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 talk 00:00, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

DYK toolbox

List of Green Bay Packers Associated Press All-Pro selections

(
)
Moved to mainspace by Gonzo fan2007 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 43 past nominations.

« Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 15:18, 24 May 2024 (UTC).

  • Probably needs a new hook as readers who aren't NFL fans or very familiar with American football may not see the interest of this hook. If a reader does not know what an "AP All-Pro" is or its significance, they won't find the hook interesting. Rejecting ALT0 per WP:DYKINT as well as the old supplementary guidelines (i.e. don't assume all readers are familiar with the sport you're talking about). Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 08:43, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Will probably have to disagree here. Readers might still not necessarily get what it means to be an "All-Pro" or how it is a big deal. Historically, our sports hooks have tended to underperform and be criticized as only appealing to sports fans, and I can't see how this hook or angle is any different. A completely different angle is probably needed here. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 15:14, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
. Requesting a second opinion. I.e. from another editor please. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 16:14, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
@Gonzo fan2007: What about something like:
ALT2: ... that the Green Bay Packers once had 14 players selected to the national All-Pro team?
I don't necessarily love the current hook, but I think the article has potential for something interesting to be picked out from it. Hey man im josh (talk) 11:59, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
I'm fine with ALT2 hey man im josh. Thank you. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 14:08, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
For anyone reading, I'm commenting for clarity that I am not reviewing this nomination, I just proposed an alternative hook. This still needs a reviewer. Hey man im josh (talk) 11:40, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
  • needs a review on ALT2. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 14:46, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
The whole article needs a review.--Launchballer 17:54, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Looks good. Nice work. I think ALT2 is interesting enough and so that one is approved. BeanieFan11 (talk) 20:29, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

  • I am unfamiliar with American sports Gonzo_fan2007; is there consensus to refer to the AP team as "the national All-Pro team"? To me, it seems like the only teams which could be called "national" would be the official ones between 1931 and 1942. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:40, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
    • AirshipJungleman29, it is a national recognition made by the Associated Press. This would be different from a regional or conference recognition. Also, it's important to differentiate between All-Stars/Pro Bowls and All-Pro. They are completely different distinctions. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 16:18, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
      • Gonzo_fan2007 But as there are many national All-Pro teams (PFWA, SN, etc.), would it not be better for the hook to say "a national" rather than "the national"? ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 16:22, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Did_you_know_nominations/List_of_Green_Bay_Packers_Associated_Press_All-Pro_selections&oldid=1232487213"