Template:Did you know nominations/List of destroyers of the Indian Navy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 20:52, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

List of destroyers of the Indian Navy[edit]

[[File:|120x133px|INS Kolkata, the lead ship of Kolkata-class destroyers ]]
INS Kolkata, the lead ship of Kolkata-class destroyers

Created/expanded by Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk). Self-nominated at 14:54, 10 July 2016 (UTC).

  • No issues found with article, ready for human review.
    • This article is new and was created on 11:22, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
    • This article meets the DYK criteria at 2463 characters
    • All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
    • This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
    • ? A copyright violation is suspected by an automated tool, with 21.3% confidence. (confirm)
      • Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
  • No overall issues detected
    • The media [[:]] is free-use
    • The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length at 102 characters
    • The hook ALT1 is an appropriate length at 56 characters
    • The hook ALT2 is an appropriate length at 63 characters
    • The hook ALT3 is an appropriate length at 117 characters
    • Krishna Chaitanya Velaga has fewer than 5 DYK credits. No QPQ required. Note a QPQ will be required after 4 more DYKs.

Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This bot is experimental; please report any issues. This is not a substitute for a human review. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 23:39, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

  • This comprehensive article is new enough and long enough. The hook facts are established from multiple inline citations and any of the hooks could be used. The image is appropriately licensed, the article is neutral and I detected no copyright issues. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:01, 31 July 2016 (UTC)