Template:Did you know nominations/Littlehampton libels

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 00:29, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

Littlehampton libels

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that in the Littlehampton libels, Edith Swan fooled three juries and two judges, had another woman sent to prison twice and was declared not guilty before finally being convicted?

• Source:
  • Hilliard, Christopher (2017). The Littlehampton Libels: A Miscarriage of Justice and a Mystery about Words in 1920s England. Oxford University Press. pp. 5–7. ISBN 978-0-1987-9965-8.
  • Humphreys, Travers (1946). Criminal Days. Recollections and Reflections. London: Hodder & Stoughton. p. 129. OCLC 2617004.

Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/What A Merry-Go-Round

Comment:

Created by SchroCat (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 8 past nominations.

SchroCat (talk) 08:47, 3 October 2024 (UTC).

• Will review this. BeanieFan11 (talk) 21:48, 4 October 2024 (UTC)

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Interesting subject. Article looks good. Nice work. (On a minor note, I changed the hook from had another women sent to prison twice to had another woman sent to prison twice, as it appears to have been a typo.) BeanieFan11 (talk) 22:31, 4 October 2024 (UTC)