Template:Did you know nominations/Lizzie McGuire

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cielquiparle (talk) 15:30, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Lizzie McGuire

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that a revival of the comedy series Lizzie McGuire was ordered in 2019, but canceled mid-production after Disney deemed it not "family-friendly" enough? Source: https://variety.com/2020/tv/news/lizzie-mcguire-disney-plus-revival-1203516882/
  • ALT1: ... that Disney Channel considered producing an animated version of their comedy series Lizzie McGuire after its star Hilary Duff departed the network in 2003? Source: https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2003-may-24-fi-dizliz24-story.html
  • ALT2: ... that Lizzie McGuire concluded production in 2003 after Disney Channel failed to meet star Hilary Duff's raised salary demands to continue playing the title character? Source: https://ew.com/article/2003/05/26/hilary-duff-and-disney-part-ways/
  • Reviewed:

Improved to Good Article status by SatDis (talk). Self-nominated at 23:43, 4 March 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Lizzie McGuire; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

• Dibs. Tkbrett (✉) 11:59, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: None required.

Overall: I think the original DYK suggestion is the best of the three. Make sure the article to which you are referring is both linked and emboldened. Also, a QPQ is needed before this can be passed. Tkbrett (✉) 12:06, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Tkbrett, I formatted the links. It appears that SatDis only has two DYK credits, so is exempt from the QPQ requirement. MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 20:43, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Thanks Mandarax. I'm not certain on that tool, as it indicates that I have never done a DYK even though I have reviewed at least a few. Tkbrett (✉) 20:54, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Thank you @Mandarax: and @Tkbrett: Yes, this is only my third DYK but happy to do QPQ in the future. You can visit my user page to confirm my contributions. User: SatDis SatDis (talk) 22:08, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Sounds good. I believe the first hook is good to go. Tkbrett (✉) 01:27, 6 March 2023 (UTC)