Template:Did you know nominations/London Irish Amateur

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 13:50, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

London Irish Amateur[edit]

Created by The C of E (talk). Self nominated at 07:05, 1 March 2014 (UTC).

  • Unfortunately I think this fails on the x5 expansion criterion. It is not a new article, but was merged in the past to London Irish. The character count at London Irish is 339 and the old article here was 565. The current article is 1535 so fails against both. Also references 2 and 3 are broken and reference 5 doesn't mention the Avenue, so that part of the hook is unverified. In fact, the refs need sorting out as there's an error with ref 4 and ref 7 doesn't seem to produce any useful information. Pity because it's otherwise a neat article. Hope this helps. --Bermicourt (talk) 11:16, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
  • I'm not sure this article is within the spirit of 1.b which I suspect means a redirect that's only ever been a redirect, not a previous article on the same topic. However, as it doesn't spell that out I'll give it the benefit of the doubt. The refs now look okay apart from the archived one; the only part of the hook I can't verify is that London Irish played at The Avenue before Reading. The ref only talks about Sunbury. Can we nail this down? --Bermicourt (talk) 12:40, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Sunbury is referring to the Avenue, since that is where it is. But to make it easier, I'll change the hook to say Sunbury. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 12:48, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Long enough, well-referenced, reads fine, hook interesting and covered by the refs, and new enough (assuming 1.b is enough to classify it as a new article, if not 1.b needs rewording!). Let's run it. --Bermicourt (talk) 14:20, 1 March 2014 (UTC)