Template:Did you know nominations/Long face syndrome

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:29, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Long face syndrome[edit]

  • ... that Long face syndrome is a relatively common condition experienced by orthodontic patients with a facial deformity and often associated with open mouth breathing?

5x expanded by 7&6=thirteen (talk). Self-nominated at 14:05, 19 December 2017 (UTC).

  • 5x expanded, in time, long enough, sourced, no apparent copyvios, QPQ done. user:7&6=thirteen, "often associated with open mouth breathing" doesn't appear to be in the article, and the entire hook is somewhat bland. How about a hook that deals with the Napoleon Dynamite reference? --Usernameunique (talk) 02:05, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
  • Looks good. Added "that" to the front, and took out the italics since the hook is referring to the character in the movie, not the movie itself. --Usernameunique (talk) 02:19, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
  • I have pulled this from prep 3 because the hook statement was previously removed from the article by another user for sourcing issues. Gatoclass (talk) 14:04, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
That's what the source says. Put it back into the article. User:Eeng is wrong. Gatoclass is excused for pulling it, as the erroneous elimination of the source was a fact.7&6=thirteen () 16:10, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
Usernameunique and User:Eeng. The reliability of the source and the propriety of the removed information (which was the hook) is being discussed at Talk:Long face syndrome. I think this pulled hook is correct. Plainly, it is a reported syndrome. 7&6=thirteen () 20:54, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Pinging EEng with a valid link so he sees this and can respond. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:10, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Like 7&6 said this is being discussed on the article's talk page. The source for ALT1 is a paid advertisement. EEng 15:53, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
  • I have struck ALT1 because it is not supported in the article, and the source for the information is, as EEng notes, a paid advertisement masquerading as a magazine article. As such, it is useless as a reliable source. If a new hook is not supplied that is both in the article and verifiable with a reliable source, I don't see how this nomination can survive at DYK. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:23, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

I don't want to kill this. How about:

EEng 02:22, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Comment Either is acceptable to me. Since only User:EEng and I have commented on the talk page, there is no consensus as to ALT 1's source. This will get the nomination off the books and onto the front page. 7&6=thirteen () 12:40, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
I hope there are no hard feelings. I have to call 'em as I see 'em. EEng 16:22, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Half of our commenting editors disagree with you. Derailing approved nominations (which was suggested by the reviewer) does not make you a candidate for "Mr. Popularity."
You gotta do what you gotta do. I know it wasn't personal.
I also appreciated that you were not just a saboteur, but eventually came around constructively to try to clean up the mess.
As the late Professor A. J. Thomas used to start every class with: "Class, life is short." And it takes too much energy to maintain a hard on for that long. So no hard feelings. This too shall pass. Cheers. 7&6=thirteen () 16:41, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Er, um, OK... EEng 16:49, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
No hard feeling. KuTGW! 7&6=thirteen () 17:00, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
I don't speak Klingon, sorry. We need Usernameunique back to tick A2 and/or A3. EEng 20:33, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Keep Up the Good Work! Usernameunique Please check in. 7&6=thirteen () 20:36, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Wouldn't that be KUtGW? EEng 03:53, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
  • New reviewer needed to check ALT2 and ALT3, since both are acceptable to nominator. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:48, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
  • ALT2 and ALT3 check out with inline citations. --Usernameunique (talk) 21:46, 5 February 2018 (UTC)