Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Luke Hancock

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Round symbols for illustrating comments about the DYK nomination The following is an archived discussion of Luke Hancock's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you knowDYK comment symbol (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: promoted by PanydThe muffin is not subtle 22:03, 17 April 2013 (UTC).

Luke Hancock

[edit]

Created by Muboshgu (talk), PM800 (talk), Oren0 (talk), and Dale Arnett (talk). Nominated by Muboshgu (talk) at 14:38, 9 April 2013 (UTC).

  • Hooks: Both Look good (short enough, cited, and interesting). I do prefer ALT1 over the other one.
  • Article: Long enough, new enough and is well referenced.

Once QPQ is completed, this will be good to go. Patriarca12 (talk) 01:43, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the review. I appreciate that you didn't give it the checkmark until I give it the QPQ; sometimes I put "IOU" there and get a checkmark anyway from a reviewer who isn't careful enough. I'll go look for something to review now. – Muboshgu (talk) 02:35, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
QPQ performed. – Muboshgu (talk) 02:50, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks! QPQ now complete and this is now good to go. Patriarca12 (talk) 10:53, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

  • Comment FWIW I prefer Alt1 also. Jrcla2 (talk) 14:50, 10 April 2013 (UTC)