Template:Did you know nominations/Lupe Fiasco versus Daigo Umehara

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by  MPJ-DK  14:32, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Lupe Fiasco versus Daigo Umehara

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that professional Street Fighter player Daigo Umehara lost an exhibition match of Street Fighter V against rapper Lupe Fiasco?

• Reviewed: (review of other DYK nomination upcoming)

Created by Maplestrip (talk). Self-nominated at 14:52, 20 August 2016 (UTC).

 • No issues found with article, ready for human review.

• • ✓ This article is new and was created on 15:14, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
  • ✓ This article meets the DYK criteria at 4366 characters
  • ✓ All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
  • ✓ This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
  • ? A copyright violation is suspected by an automated tool, with 39.0% confidence. (confirm)
    • Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.

 • No overall issues detected

• • ✓ The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length at 122 characters
  • ✓ Maplestrip has fewer than 5 DYK credits. No QPQ required. Note a QPQ will be required after 0 more DYKs.

Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This is not a substitute for a human review. Please report any issues with the bot. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 22:17, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

• "of Street Fighter V" is redundant, otherwise this looks okay.--Prisencolin (talk) 21:03, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Otherwise, he may have lost a rap battle ;) To be honest, I'm not sure how to phrase it better. ~Mable (chat) 21:14, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

• @Intelligentsium: What are you doing? ~Mable (chat) 20:05, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
  • @Maplestrip: - Sorry for the repeated reverts. The first time was to fix a bug in the review code, but this latest time is because transcluding all of the DYK pages with reviews is causing the nominations page to become too large. I have removed bot reviews that did not discover issues temporarily to mitigate this issue as the discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Did_you_know#Problem evolves. Intelligentsium 20:21, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Ah, thanks for the clarification. ~Mable (chat) 22:19, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

• Full review needed. BlueMoonset (talk) 22:39, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

• This article is new enough and long enough. The hook facts are sourced, the article is neutral and I detected no policy issues. No QPQ review required this time. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:34, 4 October 2016 (UTC)