Template:Did you know nominations/Lutheran Trinity Church, East Melbourne

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 20:17, 23 March 2019 (UTC)

Lutheran Trinity Church, East Melbourne

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that the Lutheran Trinity Church in East Melbourne has occupied the site continuously since 1853 with services conducted in German? Source: "The Lutheran Trinity Church, hall and manse are historically and socially important as having been continuously occupied by the German Lutheran Church since its foundation in 1853 with services having always been conducted in German." [1]
  • ALT1:... that the Lutheran Trinity Church in East Melbourne was added to the Victorian Heritage Register on 9 October 1974? Source: "VHR Registration October 9, 1974" expand 'Record Details' in side panel

Created by Johnuniq (talk). Self-nominated at 08:47, 12 March 2019 (UTC).

• New and long enough (about 2,000 characters), very nicely written policy-wise, properly sourced, hooks verified; in my opinion, ALT1 is definitely not interesting. I'm putting this on hold because i'm really not sure if Johnuniq (talk · contribs) is required to review an article per QPQ. If they aren't, I apologize for the hassle. Dahn (talk) 06:52, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

• Thanks Dahn. I'm sorry to report that this is my first DYK attempt (and I have no DYK credits) and my reading of the eligibility criteria is that I get a free pass until I've got five. However, there is no rush and I'm happy to wait. Johnuniq (talk) 07:04, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

• @Johnuniq: Actually, that settles it, and thanks for replying. You see, I couldn't be sure that you have had more than one DYK in your long career on wikipedia (I usually go by notifications on the talk page, but some users remove them). Your comment is good enough for tying that one loose end. Article is good to go. Dahn (talk) 07:17, 21 March 2019 (UTC)