Template:Did you know nominations/Malcolm X: A Life of Reinvention

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by George Ho (talk) 08:27, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

• Merged into Template:Did you know nominations/4 2012 Pulitzer Prize Winners. --George Ho (talk) 08:27, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Malcolm X: A Life of Reinvention

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that Malcolm X: A Life of Reinvention, the award-winning autobiography of Malcolm X, was condemned for X's alleged homosexual relationship with a white man?

• Reviewed: Connie Ediss
• Comment: This article was previously nominated is concurrently nominated in Template:Did you know nominations/4 2012 Pulitzer Prize Winners. You can review this article here and there.

Created/expanded by TonyTheTiger (talk), Malik Shabazz (talk), Green Cardamom (talk). Nominated by George Ho (talk) at 19:34, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

• As the page creator and nominator of this article, I object to this split from the original and active discussion at Template:Did you know nominations/4 2012 Pulitzer Prize Winners. I have nominated that this discussion be closed at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#reverse Template:Did you know nominations.2F4 2012 Pulitzer Prize Winners split.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 07:32, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

• P.S. I am not watching this page. If you have any concerns you would like me to address regarding this nomination comment at Template:Did you know nominations/4 2012 Pulitzer Prize Winners.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 18:51, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

• Daniel Case and Casliber, two DYK admins, do not mind this separate nom. --George Ho (talk) 07:29, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
• Indeed, the individual hook is compelling while the combo hook is a lifeless stream of blue lacking any impetus to click the bold link. (That said, I'm essentially retired from DYK and only came here because of a message on my talk page. If you need to reach me, reach me there as I will not be following this discussion.) - Dravecky (talk) 08:46, 7 June 2012 (UTC)