Template:Did you know nominations/Mas Mansoer

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:33, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Mas Mansoer[edit]

(

)

... that the National Hero of Indonesia and Islamic scholar Mas Mansoer was arrested for not convincing the people of Surabaya to surrender?

ALT1:... that the National Hero of Indonesia and Islamic scholar Mas Mansoer declared interest forbidden?
Reviewed: Not needed per current DYK rules

Created/expanded by Redyka94 (talk). Nominated by Crisco 1492 (talk) at 15:15, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

This needs to say that it's financial interest, not an interest in themselves, or another subject. Also - this isn't unique to him. Riba makes this out to be pretty standard. Secretlondon (talk) 19:38, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

ALT2... that the National Hero of Indonesia Mas Mansoer declared interest forbidden?

ALT2 links to the proper article and is hookier by not mentioning that he was a scholar of Islam. Regarding the differentiation between financial interest and emotional/psychological interest, I don't think the hook needs it so long as the article is clear. It is commonly referred to as simply "interest" in day-to-day conversation, and adding an indication that it was financial interest cuts down on the hookiness. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:11, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

I prefer ALT2 and everything checks out, except for one small point: in the hook "interest forbidden" links to riba, whereas in the article the link is to haraam – why the discrepancy? —Bruce1ee^talk 07:20, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

One is for a compound "interest forbidden", while the other has haraam directly. I'll link interest to riba, perhaps. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:59, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. ALT2 verified AGF: article seems fine, length and referencing fine, although some of my Google Book previews don't show the referenced pages; don't see any close paraphrasing for the refs I can see; hook is fine and correctly cited, although I'm assuming good faith for the offline ref. —Bruce1ee^talk 09:19, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the review! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:47, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Save for August 17 (Indonesia independence day) *Annas* (talk) 14:33, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

I don't mind. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:40, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Regrettably, the rules are a maximum hold of six weeks, which only takes us to mid-July from date of submission. Two months from today is definitely too far. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:42, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

We could, but I don't mind either which way. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 03:02, 22 June 2012 (UTC)