Template:Did you know nominations/Miloš Trifunović (politician)
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 00:23, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Miloš Trifunović (politician)
- ... that a Yugoslav politician, Miloš Trifunović, was a professor of zoology and botany before pursuing a career in politics? Source: Ministarstvo prosvete i ministri Kraljevine Srba, Hrvata i Slovenaca i Kraljevine Jugoslavije: 1918-1941 p. 122
- ALT1:... that a Yugoslav politician, Miloš Trifunović, was for a brief time professor of zoology and botany despite finishing Faculty of Philosphy of the Belgrade Higher School? Source: Ministarstvo prosvete i ministri Kraljevine Srba, Hrvata i Slovenaca i Kraljevine Jugoslavije: 1918-1941 p. 122
Moved to mainspace by OakMapping (talk). Self-nominated at 08:23, 7 April 2021 (UTC).
- The article is certainly long enough. The copyright detector says a violation is unlikely. The hooks are interesting and cited inline. This would appear to be your first DYK, so there is no need for a QPQ. Although I can't access the source cited for the hook, I will AGF.
However, the article wasn't created within 7 days of its DYK nomination, it wasn't expanded five-fold within 7 days of its nomination and it hasn't been promoted to Good Article status within 7 days of its nomination. For more information, see WP:DYKRULES. Regretfully, I'm going to have to fail this. @OakMapping: I would recommend you wait for the article to be passed as a GA and then renominate it for DYK within 7 days. I don't see any reason for it not to be approved then. Good luck! Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 14:20, 11 April 2021 (UTC)- @Amanuensis Balkanicus: Eligibility criteria 1c states: "Articles that have been worked on exclusively in a user or user talk subpage or at articles for creation or in the Draft namespace and then moved (or in some cases pasted) to the article mainspace are considered new as of the date they reach the mainspace.". I have created this article on 20 March 2021 as a userspace draft, but I moved it to mainspace only a day before I nominated it for DYK. So, shouldn't this be eglible, I am sorry if I misinterpreted something. Thanks for picking this up regardless, OakMapping (talk) 15:02, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- @OakMapping: If the article reached the mainspace on 6 April, then yes, it would eligible. That would certainly change the verdict I gave above. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 15:15, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Given that the article reached the mainspace on 6 April, I am approving this. ALT1 seems more interesting than ALT0, IMHO. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 15:19, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- @OakMapping: If the article reached the mainspace on 6 April, then yes, it would eligible. That would certainly change the verdict I gave above. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 15:15, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Amanuensis Balkanicus: Eligibility criteria 1c states: "Articles that have been worked on exclusively in a user or user talk subpage or at articles for creation or in the Draft namespace and then moved (or in some cases pasted) to the article mainspace are considered new as of the date they reach the mainspace.". I have created this article on 20 March 2021 as a userspace draft, but I moved it to mainspace only a day before I nominated it for DYK. So, shouldn't this be eglible, I am sorry if I misinterpreted something. Thanks for picking this up regardless, OakMapping (talk) 15:02, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
