Template:Did you know nominations/Mohan Singh Bisht
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Rcsprinter (chinwag) @ 23:43, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Mohan Singh Bisht
[edit]- ... that Bharatiya Janata Party politician and Member of the Delhi Legislative Assembly Mohan Singh Bisht "loves" watching religious soap operas?
- Reviewed: Women Side by Side
Created by Bill william compton (talk). Self nominated at 07:06, 15 November 2013 (UTC).
- ALT1
... that Bharatiya Janata Party politician and Member of the Delhi Legislative Assembly Mohan Singh Bisht enjoys sports like football and kabaddi?♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 10:48, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
- Article is new enough, long enough, well-referenced, no close paraphrasing seen. The original hook is very catchy; hook ref verified. QPQ done. I added some cites to statements that need them, including the hook cite, but the statement made about his not losing an election since 1998 (cited both in the lead and the body of the article) doesn't have a reference. I also found the section Political Career difficult to follow. The presentation seems to jump from his coming to Delhi, to his never losing an election, to his starting to win elections, to an accusation filed against him, to his running in 2013. It would be better to add topic sub-subheads to sort out (1) his election results, (2) his affiliations, (3) accusations, (4) current activities. I also don't understand what "contested" means. And how can he live at Dayal Pur Extension in North East Delhi if his house was demolished? Maybe you should say "his house at the time" was demolished? Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 22:10, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review. Please revisit the article. — Bill william comptonTalk 07:55, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
- ALT1