Template:Did you know nominations/Mutilator
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:20, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
Mutilator
[edit]- ... that Mutilator appeared after Desaster?
Created by Blackmetalbaz (talk). Nominated by Malconfort (talk) at 17:08, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
Article looks okay, but that's a really really bad hook. It's so ungrammatical as to be difficult to understand. And even when corrected, "Mutilator first appeared using the name Desaster" is just... bleh. DS (talk) 13:25, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
- Can I use the phrase: "... that Mutilator was described as an excellent case study in DIY ethics?"--Malconfort (talk) 00:21, 26 April 2012 (UTC)