Template:Did you know nominations/National Dairy Goat Awareness Week
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 15:54, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
National Dairy Goat Awareness Week
[edit]... that it is National Dairy Goat Awareness Week?
- Reviewed: Allison Lefcort
- Comment: Request that this please be held until the start of National Dairy Goat Awareness Week (June 14, 2014).
Created by Gobonobo (talk). Self nominated at 20:36, 6 January 2014 (UTC).
Date, length and hook all OK. Good to go on 14 June. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 20:40, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
Nominations can be submitted a maximum of six weeks in advance for the special occasion holding area. Five months is over three times that, and the request cannot be honored. Unfortunately, this means a new hook will have to be found, since this nomination cannot run during the week in question. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:53, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
- ALT1 ... that Ronald Reagan designated a week in June to be National Dairy Goat Awareness Week? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gobonobo (talk • contribs) 17:41, 7 January 2014
I am puzzled as to why this was approved originally, as it has only 1468 prose characters, clearly too few to qualify, and it is classified as a stub, also not allowed for DYK-approved nominations. The article needs to be expanded, and then the article will be ready to be given a full review, including checks that don't seem to have been done, including neutrality, close paraphrasing, and so on. BlueMoonset (talk) 20:11, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Full review needed. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:44, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
This article is new enough and long enough. QPQ has been done. The hook is well sourced and no close paraphrasing observed. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 14:08, 18 January 2014 (UTC)