Template:Did you know nominations/New York Public Library Main Branch

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 07:22, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

New York Public Library Main Branch

New York Public Library Main Branch
New York Public Library Main Branch

Improved to Good Article status by Epicgenius (talk). Self-nominated at 04:01, 28 September 2019 (UTC).

  • Epicgenius Eligible, QPQ is good, article is of a high quality. I have issue with the phrasing of the first and ALT1, because the cited article specifically says "Estimates for the capacity of the old shelves at the library have ranged widely, and critics are skeptical of a new 2.5 million figure.", and the highest estimated figure is 4 million. Additionally, the article says "Another 2.5 million books were being moved from the NYPL's ReCAP warehouse in New Jersey to Level 2 as of 2015, and when that was finished, the number of books in the Main Branch's stacks would rise to four million." To me, that implies that they can hold up to 4 million items. Further, what does "up to 3.5 million" mean? To me it reads that the maximum capacity is 3.5 million, but there actually aren't 3.5 million books. I'd like to see that tightened up. I have issue with ALT2 as says it was "The last remaining volume among the allied nations" not the only copy. ALT0, ALT1, ALT3 and ALT4 are good to go. Eddie891 Talk Work 12:55, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Image is appropriately licensed. Eddie891 Talk Work 12:58, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
  • @Eddie891: Thanks for the review. I struck out ALT2, and changed ALT1 and ALT0 a bit. I'd much rather prefer ALT3 or ALT4 though, since these are hooks you've already approved. epicgenius (talk) 14:20, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Thanks. Passing-- ALTS 0, 1, 3, 4 are good to go, but I agree with Epicgenius that 3 and 4 are better solely because the number of books in the stacks is a slippery figure. Eddie891 Talk Work 13:25, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
  • @Epicgenius: I think ALT4 would be better if you add a figure ("which contain up to 4 million books") to explain why they need a book train. Yoninah (talk) 17:54, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
  • @Epicgenius: yes, but the article seems to be saying that they can hold up to 4 million books, not that they actually do. Would it be better to cite the more precise "an estimated 2.5 million books" from the New York times? Yoninah (talk) 17:58, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Thanks. ALT6 verified and cited inline. Rest of review per Eddie891. Yoninah (talk) 18:46, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Replacing the third mention of books in ALT6 with "volumes". 17:34, 12 October 2019 (UTC)