Template:Did you know nominations/Nina Morrison
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 14:50, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Nina Morrison[edit]
... that Nina Morrison was nominated for the 2019 AFL Women's Rising Star on debut after kicking the winning behind for Geelong?[1]- ALT1:... that Nina Morrison did not take up Australian rules football until her father prompted her to attend a Geelong trial in 2016? [2]
- ALT2:... that Nina Morrison was nominated for the 2019 AFL Women's Rising Star award on debut – but suffered a season-ending knee injury in training the next week? [3]
- Reviewed: Not required, fewer than five DYK credits
- Comment: Is it possible for 4TheWynne to receive credit for the great work he's done kickstarting the article?
Created by Playlet (talk). Nominated by Teratix (talk) at 23:42, 6 February 2019 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing:
- Neutral:
- A few fragments seem to be praising Morrison in an un-encyclopedic manner (e.g. "talented midfielder" in the lead). - Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
Hook eligibility:
- Cited: - The ALT1 is not cited directly after appearing in the prose.
- Interesting:
- Other problems: - The hooks should probably include "award" after Rising Star, as it wasn't immediately obvious what "Rising Star" meant in this context.
| QPQ: None required. |
Overall: 
ALT2 is the most interesting of the bunch, followed by ALT1. I don't find ALT0 to be compelling at all to an international audience. SounderBruce 03:47, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
- Hello @SounderBruce: to answer your concerns:
- I have removed 'talented' from the lead, although many sources use this type of language.
- Source 1 covers everything in the first paragraph after 'school', and I didn't want an excessive number of repeated citations. This shouldn't be a problem if we go with ALT2.
- I have added 'award' in ALT2 and struck ALT0. – Teratix ₵ 03:17, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
- DYK criteria 3b: "Each fact in the hook must be supported in the article by at least one inline citation to a reliable source, appearing no later than the end of the sentence(s) offering that fact." (emphasis mine)
ALT2 is good to go. As long as you add a direct citation after "late 2016", then ALT1 is also ready as a backup. SounderBruce 03:34, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
